Zen Browser vs Brave (2026): Privacy, Performance, and Workspaces Compared

By Kshetez Vinayak, founder of SupaSidebar. Last updated 2026-05-23.

Quick navigation:

• New to Zen and want the full review? → Zen Browser Mac Review 2026
• Comparing Zen to Safari instead? → Zen Browser vs Safari on Mac
• Want Brave compared to Safari? → Brave vs Safari on Mac
• Looking at Safari, Zen, and Arc together? → Safari vs Zen vs Arc on Mac
• Want Zen vs SupaSidebar (sidebar across browsers)? → SupaSidebar vs Zen Browser

TL;DR:

Brave wins on raw performance, extension compatibility, and built-in privacy features (Shields, Tor windows, Leo AI). Zen Browser wins on UX, Workspaces, Compact Mode, Glance link previews, a 4-tab grid Split View, and being non-Chromium. On Speedometer 3.0 on an M3 Pro, Brave scored about 37.6 to Zen's 31.6 - Chromium-derived browsers measurably outperform the Firefox-based Zen on the JS-heavy benchmark. Zen ships a vertical sidebar with Workspaces and a Mods customization catalog (and as of the 1.20 Twilight pre-release, Boosts for color tint, custom fonts, element zap, and forced dark mode) that Brave does not match. Pick Brave for a privacy-leaning Chromium experience with crypto rewards and a Tor mode. Pick Zen for Arc-style UX on Firefox without the Chromium monoculture. Multi-browser users running both still hit a tab-pile problem neither browser solves alone, and that is the gap SupaSidebar (a Mac sidebar app that works across 25+ browsers including Zen, Brave, Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Arc, Vivaldi, Helium, and Dia) fills on top.

Quick verdict on Zen Browser vs Brave for Mac in 2026

Brave is a Chromium-based browser focused on privacy and built-in features. It ships Shields (an ad and tracker blocker), Brave Rewards (an opt-in BAT cryptocurrency system tied to first-party privacy ads), Tor private windows for stronger anonymity, and Leo AI as a sidebar assistant. As a Chromium fork it runs every Chrome Web Store extension and benefits from Chromium's performance work.

Zen Browser is an open-source, Firefox-based browser with an Arc-style vertical sidebar, Workspaces, Compact Mode, Split View, and a Mods customization catalog. It is non-Chromium by design, runs Firefox addons, and is licensed under MPL 2.0 (the same license Firefox itself uses).

The decision usually comes down to three questions. Does the Chromium engine and full Chrome Web Store extension support matter more than vertical-sidebar UX? Pick Brave. Does Arc-style Workspaces and a non-Chromium engine matter more than the last extension and the last few hundred megabytes of RAM? Pick Zen. Do you care about avoiding the Chromium monoculture for principle, not just performance? Pick Zen.

This comparison covers both browsers on Mac specifically. It does NOT cover Linux or Windows behavior, the full Zen review (see Zen Browser Mac Review 2026), the dedicated Brave review (see Brave Browser Mac Review 2026 when shipped), or the Safari comparison angle (see Brave vs Safari on Mac).

Zen Browser vs Brave: full comparison table

Three patterns from the table. Brave has a structural advantage on extensions, raw browser-engine performance (Speedometer 3.0 puts it about 19% ahead of Zen on M3 Pro), and built-in privacy/AI features that Zen does not replicate without addons. Zen has a structural advantage on UX, Workspaces, a 4-pane Split View grid, the Glance floating preview, and (in the 1.20 Twilight pre-release) Boosts, which Brave does not replicate without changing what Brave is. Neither browser solves the cross-browser tab problem for users running multiple browsers in parallel.

UX: Workspaces vs Tab Groups and Profiles

Zen's headline UX feature is Workspaces. Each Workspace is an isolated set of tabs and pinned tabs with its own visual identifier (a colored circle or emoji), its own background gradient, and optional Container Tabs binding for identity isolation. The mechanic is almost a one-to-one mapping of Arc Spaces. Cmd+1 through Cmd+8 switch Workspaces, and a long-press on the Workspace switcher brings up reorder UI.

Brave's equivalent is two separate features that together do not match Workspaces. Profiles are a Chromium concept - separate user-data directories with their own cookies, extensions, history, and bookmarks. Tab Groups are Chromium's lightweight tab-bucketing system - colored labels on tabs in the top tab bar. Brave layered Leo AI and Shields onto these but did not build a vertical-sidebar Workspaces concept.

The practical difference: switching a Workspace in Zen takes one keystroke (Cmd+1) and changes the entire visible tab set, sidebar pinned items, and optionally the cookie jar. Switching a Profile in Brave opens a new window with its own taskbar entry. Tab Groups only label and collapse tabs in the existing window. Users coming from Arc generally find Zen's model more familiar; users coming from Chrome generally find Brave's model more familiar.

Sidebar, Split View, and Glance

Zen's sidebar is the entire UX. The left sidebar holds pinned tabs at the top, the current Workspace's tabs below, and a Workspace switcher at the bottom-left. Compact Mode (Cmd+Alt+C) collapses the sidebar to a thin strip with favicons only, and also collapses the URL bar.

Zen's Split View ships a grid layout, not the 2-pane mode older Zen reviews describe. As of stable 1.19.13b, Zen supports up to 4 tabs tiled in a grid inside one Zen window, with horizontal, vertical, and grid arrangements selectable via keyboard shortcuts. This matches Arc's old 4-pane Split View ceiling - Zen's implementation is one of the few non-Arc browsers to reach feature parity here. Two-pane and three-pane modes are subsets of the 4-pane grid; users on small Mac screens typically stay at 2.

Zen's Glance feature is a floating link preview that Brave has no equivalent of. Holding Alt while clicking a link in Zen opens that link in a small overlay window on top of the current tab, without navigating away from the current page. The preview can be expanded into a full tab or dismissed back to the original tab. This is the Arc Little Arc / Picture-in-Picture-style preview pattern - useful for checking a link mid-read without losing place. The feature has been requested as a Firefox idea on Mozilla Connect, confirming there is no equivalent in vanilla Firefox or in Chromium-based Brave.

Brave does ship vertical tabs (an opt-in setting under Appearance) and a sidebar panel on the right that holds Brave Wallet, Talk, Leo AI, Brave News, and Bookmarks. The vertical-tabs view is closer to Edge's vertical tabs than Arc's sidebar - it is a left-side tab list with pinned tabs at the top, but without Workspaces, without per-tab Container binding, and without a Compact Mode that collapses the URL bar.

Brave's sidebar panel and Zen's sidebar are different things. Brave's sidebar is a feature surface (AI, wallet, news, bookmarks) that opens on demand. Zen's sidebar is the tab UI itself. Users wanting Arc-style "the sidebar IS the tabs" should pick Zen. Users wanting "Chromium with extras in a side panel" should pick Brave.

Split View, Glance, and Compact Mode are all Zen-only. Brave has no native four-pane grid, no Alt+click preview, and no URL-bar-collapsing compact mode - the workaround in Brave for multi-tab side-by-side is two windows tiled with macOS Stage Manager or a third-party window manager.

Privacy posture and Shields vs Enhanced Tracking Protection

Brave Shields is the headline privacy feature. It ships on by default, blocks ads, blocks third-party trackers, blocks fingerprinting attempts, and upgrades HTTP connections to HTTPS. Shields can be set to Standard, Aggressive, or Relaxed per site and shows a counter of blocked items in the address bar. There is a Brave Shields documentation page explaining the exact filter lists used.

Brave also ships Private Window with Tor, which routes traffic through the Tor network from inside Brave without requiring a separate Tor Browser install. This is not equivalent to full Tor Browser security (font fingerprinting and other vectors are not fully closed), but it is closer than a normal private window.

Brave Rewards is the controversial part. Users can opt in to view first-party, privacy-respecting ads and earn BAT (Basic Attention Token) - a cryptocurrency Brave created. BAT can be tipped to creators, converted to fiat, or held in Brave Wallet. The system is fully opt-in (off by default in regions where Rewards is supported), but it is also the reason some privacy purists prefer Firefox-based browsers without crypto coupling.

Zen ships Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP), which blocks third-party trackers and cryptominers on Standard mode and adds fingerprinting protection on Strict. ETP is on by default. Zen also disables Firefox telemetry by default (Firefox itself sets it on; Zen flips the switch), and removes some Mozilla-specific identifiers in the user-agent string.

For deeper ad and tracker blocking, Zen users install uBlock Origin via the Firefox addon store. uBlock Origin is widely considered the most powerful content blocker on the web (Brave's Shields and uBlock Origin overlap significantly). The difference: Brave bundles Shields and tunes them for the Brave use case; Zen relies on a community-maintained addon that the user installs and configures.

Zen does not ship a Tor mode. There is no Tor integration in Firefox, and Zen does not add one. Users wanting Tor on Zen install Tor Browser separately.

The fence is straightforward: Brave is the "everything privacy-feature bundled" pick. Zen is the "Firefox engine, Firefox privacy model, configure to taste with addons" pick.

Performance on Apple Silicon: Speedometer, RAM, and battery

This is where the engines diverge sharply. Brave inherits Chromium's V8 engine. Zen inherits Firefox's SpiderMonkey.

The cleanest cross-browser benchmark is Speedometer 3.0, an industry-standard web-app responsiveness benchmark. Jitbit's Speedometer 3.0 run on an M3 Pro measured the following scores (higher is faster):

Brave (Chromium) measures about 19% faster than Zen on this benchmark. For JS-heavy web apps (Figma, Linear, Notion, Linear-class editors), the gap is noticeable. For text browsing and reading-heavy workflows, the gap is invisible. Note: Jitbit's original post mixed RAM and Speedometer numbers in a way that prompted the author to publicly correct the methodology - the scores above are the Speedometer 3.0 numbers, not an apples-to-apples 10-tabs-idle RAM measurement. Cross-browser RAM comparisons are unreliable on Mac because Chromium counts processes differently than Firefox does, and Activity Monitor's reported memory varies by how each engine handles tab unloading.

Battery is closer than the Speedometer gap suggests. Brave's Chromium engine supports the H.264 hardware decoding path on Apple Silicon, so streaming video uses the dedicated video block. Zen does not yet support that path on Mac and falls back to software decoding, which drains the battery faster during streaming. The practical effect: an hour of YouTube on Zen on an M2 MacBook Air drains the battery faster than the same hour on Brave. For non-video web browsing, the two are closer.

Neither browser matches Safari on battery. Apple's own published spec for Safari on the M4 MacBook Pro is up to 24 hours of video streaming (Apple's M4 MacBook Pro tech specs). Brave reports about 8.2 hours on an M3 MacBook Air under typical browsing. Zen runs measurably shorter under streaming workloads.

For users who keep the laptop plugged in (16-inch MacBook Pro, Mac Mini, Studio Display setup), the RAM and battery delta is mostly invisible and the UX/feature comparison wins. For users on the road with a small Mac, Brave is the safer pick on battery alone.

Mods and Boosts vs Brave's Chromium customization

Zen's customization story has two layers now. Mods are the original layer - a curated catalog of CSS and JS that change Zen's UI ("Smaller URL bar", "Float tabs to bottom of sidebar"). Mods install via a toggle in Zen settings and auto-update when authors push changes.

The 1.20 Twilight pre-release (tracked on Zen's release notes page) added Boosts as a separate, per-site customization layer. Boosts lets users tint colors, customize fonts, zap elements off the page, and force dark mode on any website. The current stable channel (1.19.13b, Firefox 150.0.3, released May 14 2026) does not have Boosts yet - users on stable channels are still on Mods-only customization. Users who want Boosts today install the Twilight (pre-release) build instead of stable.

Brave's customization is much thinner. Chromium ships a theme system that changes colors and icons but not behavior, and Brave layers a few brand themes on top. Per-site behavior customization in Brave is the Stylus or Tampermonkey extension route - install a Chrome Web Store extension and write the CSS yourself. Brave does not ship a curated catalog of per-site styles the way Zen Mods or Zen Boosts do.

For users who care about deep per-site customization (forced dark mode, custom fonts on Wikipedia, hiding distracting elements on news sites), Zen 1.20 Twilight is the cleaner experience. For users on Zen stable who want this today, the Stylus addon plus a userstyles.world catalog is the workaround.

Extensions and the Chromium monoculture question

Brave runs every Chrome Web Store extension, plus a smaller Brave-curated catalog. The ecosystem is enormous - tens of thousands of extensions, every productivity tool, every developer tool, every niche workflow. uBlock Origin works (in Manifest V2 mode, with Brave's Manifest V3 compatibility position documented on their blog - Brave keeps Manifest V2 support running longer than Google does).

Zen runs Firefox addons via addons.mozilla.org. The catalog is smaller but covers the high-value tools: uBlock Origin (in its more powerful form, not the Chrome MV3 stripped version), Multi-Account Containers, Bitwarden, Vimium, Stylus, Tampermonkey, ReadAloud. For most users the daily workflow is fully covered.

The strategic question is the Chromium monoculture. As of 2026, Chrome, Edge, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, Arc, Dia, Comet, and others all run Chromium. Safari (WebKit) and Firefox (Gecko, including Zen) are the only mainstream non-Chromium engines on Mac. Web developers who only test on Chromium ship sites that quietly break on Firefox. Users picking a non-Chromium browser are also voting against that scenario continuing.

Brave's contribution to web platform diversity is real but limited - it ships Chromium with the privacy patches, not a different engine. Zen's contribution to web platform diversity is direct - every Zen install is a Firefox-engine install at the rendering-engine level. Users who care about the monoculture pick Zen for principle, not features.

For users who do not care about the monoculture and just want a privacy-leaning Chromium with extensions, Brave is the cleaner answer.

Sync, accounts, and ecosystem

Zen uses Firefox Sync. A free Mozilla account encrypts bookmarks, history, open tabs, passwords, and addons end-to-end and syncs them across devices. Firefox Sync also works between Zen and Firefox proper, so a user on Zen on Mac and Firefox on iOS sees the same bookmarks and tabs.

Brave uses Brave Sync, which has no account at all. Sync uses a "sync chain" - a list of devices linked via a printed or QR-coded code, with end-to-end encryption between devices. There is no central Brave account and no email-as-identity. The downside: losing all sync devices means losing the sync chain.

Workspace state (Zen Workspaces, Brave Profiles) does NOT sync across either browser's native sync. Cross-device Workspaces are an unsolved problem for both, and a place SupaSidebar fills - SupaSidebar's Spaces sync via iCloud independently of which browser is open.

iCloud integration on Mac is Safari-only. Neither Zen nor Brave integrates with iCloud Tabs, Keychain, or Handoff. Mac users who care about Apple-ecosystem stickiness keep Safari open for those flows even when Zen or Brave is the primary browser.

The multi-browser tab pile both browsers ignore

Power users on Mac rarely run only one browser. A typical setup is Safari for iCloud-tied flows (Apple Mail web, FaceTime web, Keychain-backed sites), Chromium-derived browsers (Brave, Chrome, or Arc) for sites that demand Chromium, and a daily-driver browser for general browsing. Some run Zen for the UX, Brave for the privacy-feature bundle, and Safari for the iCloud surface area in parallel.

Neither Zen nor Brave solves this problem. Zen owns Zen's tabs. Brave owns Brave's tabs. Switching from Zen to Brave to Safari means opening three different windows, each with its own tab pile, its own bookmarks, and its own command bar.

This is the actual day-to-day cost of running a multi-browser setup on Mac, and it shows up in real user pain. From a Reddit thread about Zen Browser RAM issues:

"I was using zen before but i abandon it due to high ram usage. But i miss its vertical tab very much" - Reddit user, r/macapps

And from another thread about Arc-refugee browser hunting:

"I used to Arc, but it kept crashing on me. So I switched to Safari. I really miss the sidebar (from Arc) and I want to change my browser to either Edge, Chrome or Brave" - Reddit user, r/browsers

Both quotes show the same pattern: users care about the sidebar/vertical-tab experience, but each browser ships its own version that does not extend beyond that browser. Switching browsers means losing the sidebar in the old browser AND not getting a sidebar in the new one (Brave does not ship Workspaces; Safari does not ship a vertical sidebar at all).

SupaSidebar (a Mac sidebar app that works across 25+ browsers including Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Arc, Brave, Vivaldi, Dia, Comet, Orion, Zen, Wavebox, Helium, and 13 more) is the layer on top that solves this. The sidebar sits next to whichever browser is active and shows pinned items, saved links, recent items, and Live Tabs from every supported browser at once. Pressing the Command Panel shortcut (Cmd+Ctrl+K) searches across tabs in Zen and Brave and Safari simultaneously, without alt-tabbing between browsers to find which one has the tab.

The point is not that SupaSidebar replaces Zen or Brave. It does not. The point is that a Zen user who also keeps Brave open for a Chrome-only site, or a Brave user who runs Safari for iCloud, ends up with two tab piles. SupaSidebar makes both browsers' tabs visible in one place.

When Zen Browser is the right choice

• The user wants Arc-style UX (vertical sidebar, Workspaces, Compact Mode, Split View) on Mac.
• The user values the non-Chromium engine for the web-platform-diversity argument or for principled reasons.
• The user does not need full Chrome Web Store extensions and is comfortable with the Firefox addon catalog (which covers most workflows but not every niche tool).
• The user is comfortable with the Firefox addon model for ad blocking (uBlock Origin) rather than a built-in Shields.
• The Mac has 16 GB or more of RAM, OR the user runs fewer than 30 tabs at once.
• The user runs a single primary browser or is willing to add SupaSidebar to unify tabs across multiple browsers.

Zen pairs well with: SupaSidebar for cross-browser tab unification, uBlock Origin for ad and tracker blocking, Bitwarden or 1Password for password management, Multi-Account Containers for additional identity isolation.

When Brave is the right choice

• The user wants a privacy-leaning Chromium experience without giving up Chrome Web Store extensions.
• The user wants built-in Shields, Tor private windows, and Leo AI without managing addons.
• The user is willing to engage with (or willing to ignore) Brave Rewards and BAT cryptocurrency integration.
• The user values battery life on a small Apple Silicon Mac for streaming workloads.
• The user works with sites that test only on Chromium and break on Firefox.
• The user wants the integrated VPN (paid) or Brave Wallet for Web3 work.

Brave pairs well with: SupaSidebar for cross-browser tab unification when running Brave alongside Safari or Zen, Bitwarden or 1Password for password management (Brave Wallet covers crypto wallets only), uBlock Origin for additional layer on top of Shields (some users run both for redundancy).

Conclusion: Picking Between Zen Browser and Brave for Mac in 2026

Zen Browser and Brave compete on different axes. Brave is the privacy-feature-bundle Chromium pick - Shields, Tor, Leo AI, Wallet, full Chrome Web Store, better battery on Apple Silicon for streaming. Zen is the Arc-style UX non-Chromium pick - Workspaces, Compact Mode, Split View, Mods customization, the Firefox engine, and a stronger argument for web platform diversity.

For privacy-leaning Chromium users on small Macs, Brave is the right answer in 2026. For Arc refugees and users who want sidebar UX over feature bundling, Zen is the right answer. For users running both (and likely Safari for iCloud flows too), the actual day-to-day friction is the tab pile across browsers - and that is a problem neither browser solves alone.

Single-browser users: pick Brave for built-in privacy features and Chromium extensions; pick Zen for vertical sidebar and Workspaces. Two-browser users (Zen plus Safari, or Brave plus Safari): the second browser's tab pile is the hidden cost - factor that in. Three-or-more-browser users (Zen for UX, Brave for Chromium-only sites, Safari for iCloud): the cross-browser sidebar is the layer that makes the setup work without alt-tabbing.

Next action: if the verdict points to Zen, read the Zen Browser Mac Review 2026 for the full feature walkthrough. If the verdict points to Brave, the Brave vs Safari on Mac post covers the ecosystem trade-off in depth. If you are running multiple browsers regardless of which wins, Try SupaSidebar (free tier) for the cross-browser sidebar layer.

Why we recommend SupaSidebar for multi-browser Mac users

SupaSidebar is a macOS app that brings Arc's sidebar to every browser - one sidebar for tabs, bookmarks, files, and apps across 25+ browsers including Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Arc, Zen, Vivaldi, Brave, Helium, and Dia. The sidebar is independent of any browser - Zen can quit, Brave can crash, Safari can be in another Space, and the sidebar still shows the saved links, pinned items, and Workspaces.

Live Tabs in the sidebar surfaces every open tab across every supported browser. The Command Panel (Cmd+Ctrl+K) searches across all those tabs at once. Air Traffic Control (ATC) rules route Smart Save captures to the right Space and the right browser automatically, so a GitHub link saved from Zen ends up in the dev Space and opens in the work browser profile, while a personal article saved from Safari ends up in the reading Space.

SupaSidebar runs on macOS 14 and later, syncs Spaces and saved items via iCloud (no account required), and ships a free tier with three Spaces. It is built to layer on top of whichever browser the user picks - Zen, Brave, Safari, or all three simultaneously.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Zen Browser faster than Brave?

Brave is generally faster than Zen on JavaScript-heavy sites because it runs on Chromium's V8 engine, which has more optimization investment than Firefox's SpiderMonkey. Zen, being Firefox-based, lags behind Chromium-derived browsers on raw performance. For typical browsing (reading, light SaaS use), the difference is imperceptible. For benchmark-heavy workloads (Speedometer 3, JetStream, web apps with heavy rendering), Brave measures faster.

Does Brave use more RAM than Zen?

Cross-browser RAM comparison is unreliable on Mac. Chromium counts processes differently from Firefox, and Activity Monitor's reported memory varies by how each engine unloads idle tabs. The cleaner benchmark is Speedometer 3.0, where Brave scores 37.6 to Zen's 31.6 on an M3 Pro. Brave is meaningfully faster on JS-heavy web apps. For everyday browsing, both browsers feel responsive on a 16 GB Mac and start swapping on an 8 GB Mac with 30+ tabs - the Speedometer score is the practical performance differentiator, not RAM.

Is Zen Browser more private than Brave?

It depends on the definition of private. Brave ships more privacy features built in (Shields ad and tracker blocker, Tor private windows, fingerprint protection). Zen ships Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection by default plus disabled telemetry, and relies on addons like uBlock Origin for ad and tracker blocking. The Firefox engine itself has a different fingerprinting surface than Chromium. For a "configure it and forget it" privacy setup, Brave is easier. For a Firefox-based privacy posture configured with uBlock Origin and standard hardening, Zen is competitive.

Can Brave run Firefox addons?

No. Brave runs Chrome Web Store extensions only. Firefox addons (including specifically Firefox versions of uBlock Origin that retain Manifest V2 power, Multi-Account Containers, and Tree Style Tabs) cannot run on Brave. The Brave catalog of Chromium extensions is much larger overall but lacks the specific Firefox-only tools.

Can Zen run Chrome extensions?

No. Zen runs Firefox addons via addons.mozilla.org. Chrome Web Store extensions cannot run on Zen. The Firefox addon catalog covers most common needs (uBlock Origin, Bitwarden, Multi-Account Containers, Vimium, Stylus, Tampermonkey) but lacks the Chrome-only tools and the long tail of niche Chrome extensions.

Does Brave have Workspaces like Zen?

No. Brave has Profiles (separate user-data directories with their own cookies and extensions) and Tab Groups (colored tab labels). Neither matches Zen's Workspaces, which are visual identifier-tagged tab sets with optional Container Tabs binding for identity isolation. Users wanting Arc-style Workspaces on Chromium are usually looking at Arc itself, Sigma, or SupaSidebar's Spaces feature layered on top of Brave.

Does Zen Browser have Boosts like Arc had?

Partially. The 1.20 Twilight pre-release adds Boosts - per-site customization for color tint, custom fonts, element zap, and forced dark mode. The current stable channel (1.19.13b on Firefox 150.0.3) does not yet have Boosts. Users on stable channels customize via Zen Mods (the curated CSS/JS catalog) or Firefox addons like Stylus. Boosts ships to stable when Zen promotes 1.20 from Twilight - until then it is an opt-in pre-release feature.

What is Zen Browser's Glance feature and does Brave have an equivalent?

Glance is a Zen feature where holding Alt while clicking a link opens that link in a floating preview on top of the current tab, without navigating away. The preview can be expanded to a full tab or dismissed. It is documented in Zen's user manual at docs.zen-browser.app/user-manual/glance. Brave has no equivalent floating link preview - the closest workaround is opening the link in a new background tab and switching between tabs manually, which loses the spatial advantage Glance offers.

Can I use Zen Browser and Brave together?

Yes. They are independent browsers and can run simultaneously without conflict. The catch is that each browser owns its own tab pile, its own bookmarks, and its own command bar. Switching between them constantly is the real friction. SupaSidebar's cross-browser sidebar is the layer that unifies tabs across both (and other browsers) so the multi-browser workflow has one place to search and save.

Which is better for crypto users, Zen or Brave?

Brave, easily. Brave Wallet is built into the browser and supports Ethereum, Solana, and other chains. Brave Rewards lets users earn BAT (Basic Attention Token) for viewing privacy-respecting ads. The browser was designed with Web3 in mind. Zen has no built-in crypto features. Users wanting crypto on Zen install MetaMask or a similar Firefox addon, which works but is not first-party.

Is Zen Browser or Brave better for Apple Silicon battery life?

Brave, marginally. Brave inherits Chromium's H.264 hardware decoding path on Apple Silicon, which means streaming video uses the dedicated video block instead of CPU software decoding. Zen does not yet support that path on Mac. The practical difference: an hour of YouTube drains Brave's battery less than the same hour on Zen. Neither matches Safari on battery (Apple's M4 MacBook Pro hits 24 hours of streaming on Safari, which no third-party browser approaches).

Will my Arc Browser sidebar setup work in Zen Browser or Brave?

Neither browser imports Arc's StorableSidebar.json directly. Zen Workspaces can be set up manually to approximate Arc Spaces, but pinned items and bookmark folders need to be recreated by hand. Brave has no Workspaces concept at all. For a one-click Arc import path, SupaSidebar's 3-click Arc import brings the entire Arc sidebar (pinned items, folders, Spaces) into a Mac sidebar that then works across whichever browser the user adopts next (Zen, Brave, Safari, or all three).

---

By Kshetez Vinayak, founder of SupaSidebar. SupaSidebar is a Mac sidebar app that brings Arc-style tab, bookmark, and command panel UX to every browser - Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Arc, Zen, Brave, Vivaldi, Helium, Dia, and 16 others. Try the free tier at supasidebar.com.